
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs FirePro V5900

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:

FirePro V5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V5900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).
| Insight | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V5900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and FirePro V5900

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) scores 1,200 and the FirePro V5900 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the FirePro V5900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 512 (FirePro V5900).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,232+3% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 512+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5900 has 2 GB. The FirePro V5900 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs None (FirePro V5900). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | None |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) draws 7W versus the FirePro V5900's 75W — a 165.9% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 350W (FirePro V5900). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-91% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 171.4+945% | 16.4 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V5900 launched at $599 and now averages $15. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 82.1 (FirePro V5900) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | FirePro V5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 82.1 |
| Codename | Lakefield GT2 | Cayman |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #893 | #812 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















