UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs UHD Graphics 630

Performance Spectrum - GPU

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

7

1,200

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

Intel UHD Graphics 630

15

1,231

+2.6%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).

Insight	UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and Intel UHD Graphics 630

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) scores 1,200 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 500 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

Feature	UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	Intel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score	1,200	1,231+3%
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Generation 9.5
Process Node	10 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	64	184+188%
Boost Clock	500 MHz	1150 MHz+130%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	Intel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) draws 7W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)	Intel UHD Graphics 630
TDP	7W-53%	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	171.4+109%	82.1

💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers NaN% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).