CPU
GPU
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 295
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 295
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2009). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 295 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 295 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 295
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
GeForce GTX 295
The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) scores 1,200 and the GeForce GTX 295 reaches 1,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 295 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 295).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,198 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 480 ×2+650% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 295 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1.75 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) draws 7W versus the GeForce GTX 295's 289W — a 190.5% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 680W (GeForce GTX 295). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 95°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-98% | 289W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 680W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.4+4080% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 24.0 (GeForce GTX 295) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 24.0 |
| Codename | Lakefield GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | May 28 2020 | January 8 2009 |
| Ranking | #893 | #816 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 295
