CPU
GPU
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).
| Insight | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 760A
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) scores 1,200 and the GeForce GTX 760A reaches 1,226 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Boost clocks: 500 MHz vs 657 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,226+2% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 768+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 500 MHz | 657 MHz+31% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 760A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) draws 7W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 154.8% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-87% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.4+669% | 22.3 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 and now averages $40. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 30.6 |
| Codename | Lakefield GT2 | GK106 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #893 | #813 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 760A
