
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs GeForce GT 650M

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 650M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 650M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 650M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GeForce GT 650M

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

GeForce GT 650M
The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) scores 1,200 and the GeForce GT 650M reaches 1,187 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GT 650M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 384 (GeForce GT 650M). Boost clocks: 500 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200+1% | 1,187 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 384+500% |
| Boost Clock | 500 MHz | 950 MHz+90% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 650M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 650M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) draws 7W versus the GeForce GT 650M's 45W — a 146.2% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) vs 350W (GeForce GT 650M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-84% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.4+549% | 26.4 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Lakefield GT2 | GK107 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #893 | #828 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















