UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce GT 635
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 635 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 635 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce GT 635
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 800 and the GeForce GT 635 reaches 810 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is built on Gen. 12 while the GeForce GT 635 uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 352 (GeForce GT 635).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 800 | 810+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 16 | 352+2100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 635 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 635). Decoder: Quick Sync 8 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 635).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 8 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 8 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 635's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 200W (GeForce GT 635). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 200W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.3+1233% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 40.5 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GF100 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #917 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce GT 635
