
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce GT 730M

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 730M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 730M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 730M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce GT 730M

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

GeForce GT 730M
The GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 807 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 800 and the GeForce GT 730M reaches 807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is built on Gen. 12 while the GeForce GT 730M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 384 (GeForce GT 730M). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 800 | 807 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 16 | 384+2300% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+50% | 967 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 730M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 730M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 730M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+10% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 730M). Decoder: Quick Sync 8 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 730M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 8 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 8 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 730M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 350W (GeForce GT 730M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.3+231% | 16.1 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 17.9 (GeForce GT 730M) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 17.9 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GK107 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #917 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















