UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon R7 PRO A10...

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

93%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

91%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

88%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

88%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

86%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

79%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

76%

#209

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3097%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

95%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

91%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

Insight	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 800 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is built on Gen. 12 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 10 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score	800	806
Architecture	Gen. 12	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	10 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	16	4096+25500%
Boost Clock	1450 MHz	2920 MHz+101%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: Quick Sync 8 vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder	Quick Sync 8	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Quick Sync 8	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 181% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP	15W-95%	300W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	53.3+1874%	2.7

💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 and now averages $100. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).