UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VS
Radeon R7 A8-7500

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon R7 A8-7500

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7500

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
894%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
859%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
849%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
848%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
846%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
841%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
831%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
828%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
820%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
818%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
808%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
806%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
792%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
791%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#89
Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP: $345|Avg: $140
96%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
92%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
91%
#139
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
986%
#154
Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#156
Radeon HD 5670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#157
GeForce GT 740A
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
98%
#158
Radeon HD 7420G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
97%
#159
Radeon HD 7500G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
97%
#161
GeForce GT 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
94%
#164
93%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#166
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
92%
#167
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

InsightUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 A8-7500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon R7 A8-7500

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 800 and the Radeon R7 A8-7500 reaches 811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is built on Gen. 12 while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
G3D Mark Score
800
811+1%
Architecture
Gen. 12
GCN 1.0
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
16
1024+6300%
Boost Clock
1450 MHz+49%
975 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7500's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
53.3+558%
8.1
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 16.2 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$50
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
16.2
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
Trinidad
Release
March 30 2021
June 18 2015
Ranking
#917
#467