UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon HD 8650G +...

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

#458

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2068%

#460

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1875%

#461

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1870%

#465

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1700%

#466

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1689%

#468

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#469

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#470

Radeon R9 M370X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#471

Radeon HD 8280

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#472

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#473

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#474

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#475

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

97%

#476

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#478

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

95%

#479

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

95%

#480

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

95%

#481

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#482

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

94%

#483

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

The Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 787 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 800 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual reaches 787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual).

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
G3D Mark Score	800+2%	787
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	16	640+3900%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	53.3+239%	15.7

💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $30. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 26.2 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).