UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 257.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

InsightUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-257.7%)
Leading raw performance (+257.7%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+4.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 257.7%. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
2,200
7,869+258%
Architecture
Gen. 12
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
32
896+2700%
Boost Clock
1450 MHz
1665 MHz+15%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
128 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
146.7+40%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 4.9% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$20-73%
$75
Performance per Dollar
110.0+5%
104.9
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
TU117
Release
March 30 2021
April 23 2019
Ranking
#744
#323