
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 257.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-257.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+257.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and GeForce GTX 1650

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 257.7%. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,200 | 7,869+258% |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 896+2700% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | 1665 MHz+15% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 146.7+40% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 4.9% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-73% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+5% | 104.9 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | TU117 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #744 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















