Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,492 vs 6,523).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1620 v2 better than Xeon E5-2637 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1620 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1620 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Xeon E5-2637 v2

The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,492 points. Launch price was $1,090.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E5-2637 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v2 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 scores 6,523 against the Xeon E5-2637 v2's 6,492 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v2. Both processors carry 10 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon E5-2637 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+3%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	6,523	6,492