Xeon E5-1680 v2
VS
Core i7-9700E

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i7-9700E

Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700E

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is positioned at rank #943 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1680 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
28904%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5457%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4849%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3746%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
94%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
89%
#943
Xeon E5-1680 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $150
100%
#944
Opteron 144
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
99%
#945
Opteron 4386
MSRP: $459|Avg: $459
99%
#946
Xeon E5-2640
MSRP: $885|Avg: N/A
99%
#947
Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $555
99%
#949
Xeon E5-2630 v2
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1224
97%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
92%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
90%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700E

#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
106%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
106%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
105%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
105%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
105%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
105%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
105%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
103%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
47%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
103%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
102%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
102%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
101%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
101%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
44%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
41%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
101%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
41%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
100%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
100%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
99%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
40%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
39%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
98%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
98%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
98%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
96%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
95%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
32%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700E (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+18%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core i7-9700E

Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i7-9700E's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-9700E uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 scores 12,396 against the Core i7-9700E's 12,575 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-9700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,579 vs 6,800 (23.1% advantage for the Xeon E5-1680 v2). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 750 vs 1,172, a 43.9% lead for the Core i7-9700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,500 vs 6,802 (40.7% advantage for the Core i7-9700E). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700E.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock
3 GHz+15%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)+108%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
12,396
12,575+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,579+26%
6,800
Geekbench 6 Single
750
1,172+56%
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,500
6,802+51%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700E — the Core i7-9700E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1680 v2 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-1680 v2) vs 2 (Core i7-9700E). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-1680 v2) vs 16 (Core i7-9700E) — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602,X79 (Xeon E5-1680 v2) and H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i7-9700E).

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2) vs Yes (Core i7-9700E). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Yes
Target Use
Server/Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 launched at $1723 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700E debuted at $259. At current prices ($150 vs $180), the Xeon E5-1680 v2 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1680 v2 delivers 82.6 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700E — making the Xeon E5-1680 v2 the 16.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Core i7-9700E
MSRP
$1723
$259-85%
Avg Price (30d)
$150-17%
$180
Performance per Dollar
82.6+18%
69.9
Release Date
2013
2019