Xeon E5-2650 v2
VS
Core i5-10400T

Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core i5-10400T

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is positioned at rank #272 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4243%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
801%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
712%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
550%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
100%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
100%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
99%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
98%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
97%
#272
Xeon E5-2650 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400T

#175
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $105.5
106%
#176
Core i7-13700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
106%
#177
Athlon 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
105%
#178
Core i5-13500E
MSRP: $235|Avg: $235
105%
#179
Core i5-12500E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $200
104%
#180
Core i9-11900
MSRP: $439|Avg: $220
104%
#181
Core i7-12700E
MSRP: $314|Avg: $278
104%
#182
Core i3-14100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $135
104%
#183
Core i5-13400T
MSRP: $221|Avg: $200
104%
#184
Core i3-12300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
103%
#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
102%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
102%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
101%
#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
101%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
100%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
100%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
99%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
98%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
98%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
97%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
97%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
97%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
96%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
95%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
94%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
94%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10400T (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2650 v2Core i5-10400T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2650 v2Core i5-10400T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Core i5-10400T

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v2

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,795 points. Launch price was $650.

Intel

Core i5-10400T

The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-10400T offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v2 scores 9,795 against the Core i5-10400T's 9,789 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T.

FeatureXeon E5-2650 v2Core i5-10400T
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+67%
12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
9,795
9,789
Geekbench 6 Single
1,272
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400T — the Core i5-10400T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) vs 2 (Core i5-10400T). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) vs 16 (Core i5-10400T) — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400T).

FeatureXeon E5-2650 v2Core i5-10400T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.

FeatureXeon E5-2650 v2Core i5-10400T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop