Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-1250P

Intel

Xeon E5-2658 v4

14 Cores28 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1250P

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-1250P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-1250P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-1250P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-1250P

2020

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (14,259 vs 14,434).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
    • Launch MSRP is still $311 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon W-1250P better than Xeon E5-2658 v4?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-1250P is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2658 v4 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2658 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2658 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon W-1250P is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1250P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $311 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon W-1250P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-1250P Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2658 v4

    The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

    Intel

    Xeon W-1250P

    The Xeon W-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,259 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon E5-2658 v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-1250P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1250P — a 70.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1250P. The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2658 v4 scores 14,434 against the Xeon W-1250P's 14,259 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2658 v4. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250P.

    FeatureXeon E5-2658 v4Xeon W-1250P
    Cores / Threads
    14 / 28+133%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    2.3 GHz
    4.8 GHz+109%
    Base Clock
    4.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    35 MB+192%
    12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
    L2 Cache
    3.5 MB
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell (2015−2019)
    PassMark
    14,434+1%
    14,259
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1250P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureXeon E5-2658 v4Xeon W-1250P
    Socket
    FCLGA2011-3
    LGA1200
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+67%
    PCIe 3.0