Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Gold 6134

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,471 vs 16,519).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6134 better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6134 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6134 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6134 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6134 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6134 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,214 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014), 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6134 has 2 more cores. The Xeon Gold 6134 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4809 v2 scores 16,471 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6134. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Xeon E7-4809 v2	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	none	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+68%
L3 Cache	12 MB	24.75 MB+106%
L2 Cache	—	8 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	—	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,471	16,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.