Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8256

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8256 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8256: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8256 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,471 vs 16,787).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 17 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8256

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8256 better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8256 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8256 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8256 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8256 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Platinum 8256 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8256 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014), 37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8256 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8256

The Xeon Platinum 8256 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,787 points. Launch price was $7,007.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8256 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E7-4809 v2 has 2 more cores. The Xeon Platinum 8256 is built on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4809 v2 scores 16,471 against the Xeon Platinum 8256's 16,787 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8256. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8256.

Feature	Xeon E7-4809 v2	Xeon Platinum 8256
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	none	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	12 MB	16.5 MB (total)+38%
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	—	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	16,471	16,787+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8256 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.