Xeon Gold 5512U vs Xeon W-3375

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5512U vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5512U vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $3,721 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 270W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3375 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,091 vs 60,367).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
❌45.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 185W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5512U better than Xeon W-3375?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3375 is ahead with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5512U is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5512U comes in $3,721 cheaper on MSRP at $1,230 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3375 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 311.2% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5512U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 5512U vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5512U packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3375 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5512U uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5512U scores 60,367 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5512U	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	28 / 56	38 / 76+36%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	52.5 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Emerald Rapids (2023)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	60,367+2%	59,091
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5512U uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5512U	Xeon W-3375
Socket	LGA4677	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+25%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5512U) vs true (Xeon W-3375). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5512U	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 5512U was priced at $1230, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($1230 vs $4951), Xeon Gold 5512U was $3721 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5512U delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 121.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5512U	Xeon W-3375
MSRP	$1230-75%	$4951
Performance per Dollar	49.1+313%	11.9
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Xeon Gold 5512U on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.