Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon Platinum 8268

Intel

Xeon Gold 6130H

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon Platinum 8268 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon Platinum 8268: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $4,408 less on MSRP ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
  • Delivers 236.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
  • Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8268 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 36 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +62.5% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,440).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
  • 64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6130H better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8268 is ahead with a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130H pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8268 also has the bigger cache pool with 62.5% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6130H is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6130H comes in $4,408 cheaper on MSRP at $1,894 MSRP versus $6,302 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8268 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 236.1% better value on MSRP (18.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8268 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and 62.5% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 22 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6130H packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8268 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8268 is built on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130H scores 35,440 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130H. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.

FeatureXeon Gold 6130HXeon Platinum 8268
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
22 MB
35.75 MB (total)+63%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
35,440+1%
35,081
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,046
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6130H uses the FCLGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Platinum 8268 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).

FeatureXeon Gold 6130HXeon Platinum 8268
Socket
FCLGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2666
DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
1024 GB+33%
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.

FeatureXeon Gold 6130HXeon Platinum 8268
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6130H was priced at $1894, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 came in at $6302. On launch pricing ($1894 vs $6302), Xeon Gold 6130H was $4408 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6130H delivers 18.7 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 6130H the 108.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon Gold 6130HXeon Platinum 8268
MSRP
$1894-70%
$6302
Performance per Dollar
18.7+234%
5.6
Release Date
2018
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.