PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6130H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6130H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 35,515).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5416S is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5416S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5416S is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5416S comes in $449 cheaper on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 31.4% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5416S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6130H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5416S

The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 6130H share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	30 MB+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	35,515	35,440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 65% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 768 — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	LGA4677	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4400+65%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096+433%	768
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+67%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 5416S was priced at $1445, while the Xeon Gold 6130H came in at $1894. On launch pricing ($1445 vs $1894), Xeon Gold 5416S was $449 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5416S delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the Xeon Gold 5416S the 27.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP	$1445-24%	$1894
Performance per Dollar	24.6+32%	18.7
Release Date	2023	2018

Search Xeon Gold 5416S on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6130H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.