Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon W-3265M
Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon W-3265M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 5416S
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,445) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+142%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,445) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon W-3265M
Xeon Gold 5416S
The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.
Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5416S packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 14% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 33 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 35,515 | 35,506 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4400+50% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5416S launched at $1445 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3265M debuted at $6300.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1445-77% | $6300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $3500 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon W-3265M
