EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 5416S

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 5416S

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 5416S Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

+1.6%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 5416S

16 / 32

35,515

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 5416S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 5416S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Costs $806 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,515 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than Xeon Gold 5416S?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5416S is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 8124P also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8124P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8124P comes in $806 cheaper on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $1,445 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 5416S is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 129.7% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 5416S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon Gold 5416S

The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8124P and Xeon Gold 5416S share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon Gold 5416S's 35,515 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 5416S
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz+23%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+113%	30 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,079+2%	35,515

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S — the EPYC 8124P supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) — the EPYC 8124P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 5416S
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+9%	4400
Max RAM Capacity	2048	4096+100%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+20%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5416S). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 5416S
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon Gold 5416S came in at $1445. On launch pricing ($639 vs $1445), EPYC 8124P was $806 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5416S — making the EPYC 8124P the 78.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP	$639-56%	$1445
Performance per Dollar	56.5+130%	24.6
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 5416S on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.