EPYC 8124P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E7-8867 v3

16 Cores32 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon E7-8867 v3

16 / 32

36,908

+2.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $4,033 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
✅Delivers 614.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8867 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 36,908).

Xeon E7-8867 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8867 v3 better than EPYC 8124P?

Yes. Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8867 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8124P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E7-8867 v3 comes in 631.1% more expensive on MSRP at $4,672 MSRP versus $639 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8124P is also 614.7% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon E7-8867 v3

The Xeon E7-8867 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,908 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8124P and Xeon E7-8867 v3 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 36,908 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon E7-8867 v3. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8867 v3.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	2.5 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+42%	45 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	5 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Haswell-EX (2015)
PassMark	36,079	36,908+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	850
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — the EPYC 8124P supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8867 v3). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8867 v3) — the EPYC 8124P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and C602J (Xeon E7-8867 v3).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Socket	SP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+157%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+33%	1536 GB
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+200%	32

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8124P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8867 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E7-8867 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 came in at $4672. On launch pricing ($639 vs $4672), EPYC 8124P was $4033 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — making the EPYC 8124P the 150.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP	$639-86%	$4672
Performance per Dollar	56.5+615%	7.9
Release Date	2023	2015

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8867 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.