EPYC 8124P vs Xeon w5-3425

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon w5-3425 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon w5-3425

12 / 24

36,178

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon w5-3425 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon w5-3425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 36,178).

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than EPYC 8124P?

Yes. Xeon w5-3425 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3425 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3425 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8124P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w5-3425 comes in 86.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,189 MSRP versus $639 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8124P is also 85.6% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 30.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3425 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon w5-3425 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3425 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	3.2 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+113%	30 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,079	36,178

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	112+17%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3425). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon w5-3425 came in at $1189. On launch pricing ($639 vs $1189), EPYC 8124P was $550 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the EPYC 8124P the 59.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon w5-3425
MSRP	$639-46%	$1189
Performance per Dollar	56.5+86%	30.4
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3425 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.