EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6330N

AMD

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
····
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6330N

28 Cores56 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6330N Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6330N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6330N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
  • Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Delivers 271.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 36,360).

Xeon Gold 6330N

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($2,389 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
  • 32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than Xeon Gold 6330N?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8124P is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6330N pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. EPYC 8124P also has the bigger cache pool with 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6330N is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 8124P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8124P comes in $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $2,389 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6330N is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 271.0% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6330N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6330N

The Xeon Gold 6330N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 36,360 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330N has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330N — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6330N (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 8124P is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon Gold 6330N's 36,360 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6330N. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 42 MB on the Xeon Gold 6330N.

FeatureEPYC 8124PXeon Gold 6330N
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.45 GHz+11%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+52%
42 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-50%
10 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
36,079
36,360
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330N uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus 2667 on the Xeon Gold 6330N — the EPYC 8124P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330N supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6330N). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330N) — the EPYC 8124P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330N).

FeatureEPYC 8124PXeon Gold 6330N
Socket
SP6
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+80%
2667
Max RAM Capacity
2048
6144+200%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
96+50%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6330N). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon Gold 6330N rivals EPYC 7413.

FeatureEPYC 8124PXeon Gold 6330N
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon Gold 6330N came in at $2389. On launch pricing ($639 vs $2389), EPYC 8124P was $1750 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330N — making the EPYC 8124P the 115.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 8124PXeon Gold 6330N
MSRP
$639-73%
$2389
Performance per Dollar
56.5+272%
15.2
Release Date
2023
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.