EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6338T

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6338T

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6338T Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

+0.8%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 6338T

24 / 48

35,801

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6338T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6338T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 395.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6338T

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,801 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than Xeon Gold 6338T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6338T is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. EPYC 8124P also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8124P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8124P comes in $2,500 cheaper on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $3,139 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6338T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 395.1% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon Gold 6338T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon Gold 6338T

The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6338T (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon Gold 6338T's 35,801 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6338T
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz+17%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+78%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	36,079	35,801

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338T — the EPYC 8124P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6338T). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) — the EPYC 8124P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6338T
Socket	SP6	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	2048	6144+200%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+50%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338T). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6338T
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon Gold 6338T came in at $3139. On launch pricing ($639 vs $3139), EPYC 8124P was $2500 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338T — making the EPYC 8124P the 132.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP	$639-80%	$3139
Performance per Dollar	56.5+396%	11.4
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6338T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.