PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6338T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6338T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,694 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 115.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,515 vs 35,801).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).

Xeon Gold 6338T

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Xeon Gold 6338T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5416S is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6338T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6338T also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6338T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5416S is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5416S comes in $1,694 cheaper on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $3,139 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6338T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 115.5% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5416S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Gold 6338T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5416S

The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

Xeon Gold 6338T

The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5416S packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon Gold 6338T's 35,801 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338T. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6338T
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	30 MB	36 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	35,515	35,801

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338T — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 37.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6338T
Socket	LGA4677	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4400+38%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+25%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6338T
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 5416S was priced at $1445, while the Xeon Gold 6338T came in at $3139. On launch pricing ($1445 vs $3139), Xeon Gold 5416S was $1694 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5416S delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338T — making the Xeon Gold 5416S the 73.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP	$1445-54%	$3139
Performance per Dollar	24.6+116%	11.4
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Xeon Gold 5416S on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6338T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.