EPYC 4345P
Xeon Gold 5416S
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 5416S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 5416S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 5416S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4345P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,116 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 345.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5416S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,515 vs 36,006).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4345P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4345P better than Xeon Gold 5416S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 5416S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4345P
The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.
Xeon Gold 5416S
The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5416S has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S — a 31.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4345P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the Xeon Gold 5416S's 35,515 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4345P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+38% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+7% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 36,006+1% | 35,515 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S — the EPYC 4345P supports 27.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S).
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+27% | 4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5416S). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5416S requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the Xeon Gold 5416S came in at $1445. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1445), EPYC 4345P was $1116 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5416S — making the EPYC 4345P the 126.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4345P | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-77% | $1445 |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.4+345% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4345P and Xeon Gold 5416S
