EPYC 4345P vs Xeon W-3265M

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4345P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3265M

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4345P

8 / 16

36,006

+1.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon W-3265M

24 / 48

35,506

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,971 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1841.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon W-3265M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,506 vs 36,006).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4345P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4345P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than Xeon W-3265M?

Yes. EPYC 4345P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4345P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4345P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $5,971 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $6,300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1841.9% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 17.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 4345P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4345P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+20%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	33 MB+3%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	36,006+1%	35,506

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the EPYC 4345P supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon W-3265M
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+91%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	128	1024+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($329 vs $6300), EPYC 4345P was $5971 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M — making the EPYC 4345P the 180.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon W-3265M
MSRP	$329-95%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	109.4+1854%	5.6
Release Date	2025	2019

Search EPYC 4345P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3265M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.