EPYC 4345P vs M3 Max 14-Core

EPYC 4345P vs M3 Max 14-Core Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4345P

8 / 16

36,006

0.0%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

M3 Max 14-Core

14 / 14

36,529

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4345P vs M3 Max 14-Core FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4345P vs M3 Max 14-Core: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,006 vs 36,529).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M3 Max 14-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

M3 Max 14-Core

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4345P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than M3 Max 14-Core?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4345P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M3 Max 14-Core is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M3 Max 14-Core is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that M3 Max 14-Core is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4345P vs M3 Max 14-Core Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

M3 Max 14-Core

The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the M3 Max 14-Core offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the M3 Max 14-Core has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core — a 30.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The EPYC 4345P is built on the Grado (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the M3 Max 14-Core's 36,529 — a 1.4% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	M3 Max 14-Core
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 14+75%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+35%	4.06 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+38%	2.748 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm	3 nm-25%
Architecture	Grado (2025)	—
PassMark	36,006	36,529+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M3 Max 14-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4345P supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 96 — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) — the EPYC 4345P offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core).

Feature	EPYC 4345P	M3 Max 14-Core
Socket	AM5	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	128+33%	96
RAM Channels	2	0
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	28	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4345P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4345P) and Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core) (M3 Max 14-Core) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.