Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 4345P vs EPYC 7303P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 4345P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2025
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4345P vs EPYC 7303P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4345P
8 / 16
36,006
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 6860Z
brand logoRyzen AI 7 PRO 350
brand logoRyzen 7 5800XT
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
brand logoRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
EPYC 7303P
16 / 32
36,487
+1.3%
brand logoRyzen 5 5600GT
brand logoRyzen 7 5700G
brand logoRyzen 7 260
brand logoRyzen AI Max 385
brand logoRyzen 9 8945HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4345P vs EPYC 7303P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low257 FPS
medium239 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra178 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low159 FPS
medium130 FPS
high109 FPS
ultra86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low630 FPS
medium526 FPS
high436 FPS
ultra393 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low390 FPS
medium346 FPS
high283 FPS
ultra225 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low900 FPS
medium747 FPS
high664 FPS
ultra570 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low644 FPS
medium526 FPS
high469 FPS
ultra411 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low900 FPS
medium900 FPS
high856 FPS
ultra772 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low885 FPS
medium806 FPS
high696 FPS
ultra610 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low324 FPS
medium248 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra185 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low299 FPS
medium228 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra185 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low297 FPS
medium262 FPS
high199 FPS
ultra158 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low245 FPS
medium218 FPS
high170 FPS
ultra135 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low380 FPS
medium338 FPS
high291 FPS
ultra251 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low301 FPS
medium261 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra194 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 4345P
low250 FPS
medium233 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra185 FPS
1080P
EPYC 7303P
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 4345P vs EPYC 7303P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $265 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 78.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (36,006 vs 36,487).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
  • ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4345P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4345P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than EPYC 7303P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4345P is ahead with a 28.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7303P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $265 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7303P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 78.2% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4345P vs EPYC 7303P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7303P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P — a 47.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4345P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7303P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the EPYC 7303P's 36,487 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P.

FeatureEPYC 4345PEPYC 7303P
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.5 GHz+62%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+58%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
36,006
36,487+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7303P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus 3200 on the EPYC 7303P — the EPYC 4345P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 8 (EPYC 7303P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 128 (EPYC 7303P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and SP3 (EPYC 7303P).

FeatureEPYC 4345PEPYC 7303P
Socket
AM5
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+75%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
128
4096+3100%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, IOMMU virtualization. The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.

FeatureEPYC 4345PEPYC 7303P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
AMD-V, IOMMU
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the EPYC 7303P came in at $594. On launch pricing ($329 vs $594), EPYC 4345P was $265 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 61.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7303P — making the EPYC 4345P the 56.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4345PEPYC 7303P
MSRP
$329-45%
$594
Performance per Dollar
109.4+78%
61.4
Release Date
2025
2023
Search EPYC 4345P on AmazonSearch EPYC 7303P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.