EPYC 4345P vs Xeon w5-3425

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon w5-3425 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4345P

8 / 16

36,006

0.0%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon w5-3425

12 / 24

36,178

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon w5-3425 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon w5-3425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 259.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w5-3425 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,006 vs 36,178).

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4345P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than Xeon w5-3425?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4345P is ahead with a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $860 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w5-3425 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 259.7% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 30.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon w5-3425 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon w5-3425 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 4345P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+20%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+7%	30 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,006	36,178

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the EPYC 4345P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3425). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w5-3425 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the Xeon w5-3425 came in at $1189. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1189), EPYC 4345P was $860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the EPYC 4345P the 113% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon w5-3425
MSRP	$329-72%	$1189
Performance per Dollar	109.4+260%	30.4
Release Date	2025	2023

Search EPYC 4345P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3425 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.