EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 6130H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4345P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6130H

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 6130H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4345P

8 / 16

36,006

+1.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 6130H

16 / 32

35,440

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 6130H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 6130H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,565 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 484.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,006).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. EPYC 4345P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 38.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4345P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 38.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4345P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $1,565 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it still gives you a 38.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 484.9% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4345P vs Xeon Gold 6130H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4345P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6130H offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 39.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4345P is built on the Grado (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4345P scores 36,006 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 4345P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+49%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+81%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+45%	22 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	—
PassMark	36,006+2%	35,440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4345P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4345P versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the EPYC 4345P supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6130H supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4345P) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4345P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the Xeon Gold 6130H offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4345P) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	AM5	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+110%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	128	768+500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	48+71%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6130H). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6130H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488; Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4345P was priced at $329, while the Xeon Gold 6130H came in at $1894. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1894), EPYC 4345P was $1565 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4345P delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the EPYC 4345P the 141.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4345P	Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP	$329-83%	$1894
Performance per Dollar	109.4+485%	18.7
Release Date	2025	2018

Search EPYC 4345P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6130H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.