
Xeon Gold 6130H

Xeon w5-3425
Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon w5-3425 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon w5-3425 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon w5-3425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6130H
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,178).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w5-3425
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Costs $705 less on MSRP ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than Xeon Gold 6130H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6130H vs Xeon w5-3425 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6130H
The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w5-3425
The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6130H packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3425 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon w5-3425 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130H scores 35,440 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 30 MB+36% |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 35,440 | 36,178+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6130H uses the FCLGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the Xeon w5-3425 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | DDR5-4800+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | 4096 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 112+133% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6130H was priced at $1894, while the Xeon w5-3425 came in at $1189. On launch pricing ($1894 vs $1189), Xeon w5-3425 was $705 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6130H delivers 18.7 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the Xeon w5-3425 the 47.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130H | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1894 | $1189-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.7 | 30.4+63% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















