Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs EPYC 9384X
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
EPYC 9384X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9384X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,995) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,995) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9384X
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9384X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 13.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 9384X is built on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352Y scores 68,643 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 4.9% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB | 768 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 68,643 | 72,121+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the EPYC 9384X supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y launched at $3995 MSRP, while the EPYC 9384X debuted at $5529.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352Y | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3995-28% | $5529 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $4157 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9384X
