Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 205W instead of 300W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3,396 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • Delivers 564.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (68,385 vs 68,643).
  • 46.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 205W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8571N is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 525% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 48 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8571N comes in $3,396 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 564.4% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8571N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 300 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8571N is built on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352Y scores 68,643 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8352YXeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
52 / 104+63%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
48 MB
300 MB (total)+525%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
68,643
68,385
Geekbench 6 Single
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
60,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8352YXeon Platinum 8571N
Socket
LGA4189
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
80+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8352YXeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Cloud Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8352Y was priced at $3995, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($3995 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $3396 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352Y delivers 17.2 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 147.7% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8352YXeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP
$3995
$599-85%
Performance per Dollar
17.2
114.2+564%
Release Date
2021
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.