Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • Delivers 61.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (66,614 vs 68,643).
  • 36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

  • +3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 46.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX comes in $1,596 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 46.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better PassMark. It is also 61.6% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is built on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+32%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+73%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB+167%
48 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
66,614
68,643+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
45,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket
sWRX8
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB
4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Professional Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was priced at $2399, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($2399 vs $3995), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 47.1% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WXXeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP
$2399-40%
$3995
Performance per Dollar
27.8+62%
17.2
Release Date
2022
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.