
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,614 vs 68,643).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is built on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+32% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+73% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+167% | 48 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 66,614 | 68,643+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was priced at $2399, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($2399 vs $3995), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 47.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399-40% | $3995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.8+62% | 17.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














