EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

AMD

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···

EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

  • +4.2% higher PassMark.
  • +500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3,191 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
  • Delivers 123.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (66,614 vs 69,432).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 7573X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 29.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X pulls ahead with 4.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7573X also has the bigger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX comes in $3,191 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $5,590 MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7573X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.2% better PassMark. It is also 123.6% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7573X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 4.1% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+33%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+500%
128 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Milan-X (2022)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
69,432+4%
66,614
Cinebench R23 Multi
45,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket
SP3
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+100%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Professional Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $2399), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $3191 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 76.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP
$5590
$2399-57%
Performance per Dollar
12.4
27.8+124%
Release Date
2022
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.