Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 / 48

66,614

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

+2.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+287.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 39.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the stronger fit. You are getting 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8571N comes in $1,800 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,399 MSRP, and it still gives you 287.1% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 39.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 311.1% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 27.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB), more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 1,961, a 23.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 60,000 (117.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	52 / 104+117%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+13%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB	300 MB (total)+134%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	66,614	68,385+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	1,961+27%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	60,000+287%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was priced at $2399, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($2399 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $1800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 121.7% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP	$2399	$599-75%
Performance per Dollar	27.8	114.2+311%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8571N on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.