Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Xeon Platinum 8571N
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8571N
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($225) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($418) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Emerald Rapids (2023) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+81%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($225) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($418) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon Platinum 8571N
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Xeon Platinum 8571N
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 1,961, a 23.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 60,000 (117.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 52 / 104+117% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 300 MB (total)+134% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 66,614 | 68,385+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | 1,961+27% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | 60,000+287% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. At current prices ($225 vs $418), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $193 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 296.1 pts/$ vs 163.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 57.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $599-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $225-46% | $418 |
| Performance per Dollar | 296.1+81% | 163.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon Platinum 8571N
