Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Xeon w7-3555
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w7-3555 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w7-3555 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w7-3555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 325W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 17,120).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3555 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w7-3555
2024Why buy it
- ✅+10.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($2,749 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ❌16.1% higher power demand at 325W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon w7-3555?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w7-3555 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Xeon w7-3555
The Xeon w7-3555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 325 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 67,754 points. Launch price was $2,339.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3555 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon w7-3555 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3555 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3555 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon w7-3555's 67,754 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon w7-3555. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 2,300, a 39% lead for the Xeon w7-3555 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 17,120 (9.9% advantage for the Xeon w7-3555). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon w7-3555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 28 / 56+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+41% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+71% | 75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 66,614 | 67,754+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | 2,300+48% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | 17,120+10% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3555 — the Xeon w7-3555 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3555 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3555) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and W790 (Xeon w7-3555).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon w7-3555 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3555 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs true (Xeon w7-3555). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon w7-3555 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon w7-3555 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was priced at $2399, while the Xeon w7-3555 came in at $2749. On launch pricing ($2399 vs $2749), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3555 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 11.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Xeon w7-3555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399-13% | $2749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.8+13% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Xeon w7-3555
