EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9384X

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9384X

32 / 64

72,121

+5.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 / 64

68,643

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 768 MB vs 48 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
❌56.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 205W.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,534 less on MSRP ($3,995 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 205W instead of 320W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (48 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 72,121).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9384X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9384X better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?

Yes. EPYC 9384X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9384X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 768 MB versus 48 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9384X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8352Y is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9384X comes in 38.4% more expensive on MSRP at $5,529 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8352Y is also 31.7% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9384X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9384X and Xeon Platinum 8352Y share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 13.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9384X is built on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 4.9% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+15%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+41%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1500%	48 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	—
PassMark	72,121+5%	68,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9384X versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the EPYC 9384X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 9384X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9384X was priced at $5529, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $3995), Xeon Platinum 8352Y was $1534 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Xeon Platinum 8352Y the 27.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP	$5529	$3995-28%
Performance per Dollar	13.0	17.2+32%
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC 9384X on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8352Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.