PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Xeon w7-2595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Xeon w7-2595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+175.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+515.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 49 MB).
✅Costs $1,440 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Delivers 252.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Xeon w7-2595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (21,758 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than Xeon Platinum 8571N?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-2595X is ahead with a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 175.8% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 515.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 49 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the stronger fit. You are getting 175.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 515.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 49 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2595X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8571N is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-2595X comes in 240.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,039 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8571N is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 175.8% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8571N is also 252.4% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2595X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Xeon w7-2595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

Xeon w7-2595X

The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8571N packs 52 cores / 104 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8571N uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8571N scores 68,385 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 3.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,436, a 21.6% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 60,000 vs 21,758 (93.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8571N	Xeon w7-2595X
Cores / Threads	52 / 104+100%	26 / 52
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	300 MB (total)+515%	48.75 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Emerald Rapids (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	68,385+4%	66,049
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	48,442
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	2,436+24%
Geekbench 6 Multi	60,000+176%	21,758

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8571N	Xeon w7-2595X
Socket	LGA4677	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+25%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2595X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8571N	Xeon w7-2595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Cloud Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8571N was priced at $599, while the Xeon w7-2595X came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($599 vs $2039), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $1440 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8571N delivers 114.2 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 111.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8571N	Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP	$599-71%	$2039
Performance per Dollar	114.2+252%	32.4
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Xeon Platinum 8571N on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.