3015e
Core i5-10400F
3015e vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
3015e vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
3015e vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
3015e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 3, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,618 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +206.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike 3015e.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while 3015e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while 3015e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than 3015e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3015e vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
3015e
The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The 3015e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 60.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 133.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | 3015e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+87% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+142% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Pollock (Zen) (2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,618 | 13,029+398% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | 3015e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR4-2666+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The 3015e includes integrated graphics (Vega 3), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | 3015e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on 3015e and Core i5-10400F
