3015e
Ryzen 9 5900X
3015e vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
3015e vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
3015e vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
3015e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 105W, a 104W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 3, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,618 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +385.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while 3015e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌10400% higher power demand at 105W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while 3015e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than 3015e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
3015e vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
3015e
The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The 3015e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 70.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 174.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | 3015e | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+109% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+208% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 64 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Pollock (Zen) (2020) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 2,618 | 38,955+1388% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | 3015e | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The 3015e includes integrated graphics (Vega 3), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | 3015e | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on 3015e and Ryzen 9 5900X
