A10-4600M
VS
Core i5-12400F

A10-4600M vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

A10-4600M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A10-4600M is positioned at rank #661 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-4600M

#649
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
904%
#650
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
890%
#651
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
817%
#652
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
814%
#653
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
806%
#655
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
779%
#656
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
747%
#657
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
745%
#658
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
725%
#661
A10-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-4600MCore i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-4600M (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-4600MCore i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-4600M and Core i5-12400F

AMD

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 163.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 342 vs 1,700, a 133% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 916 vs 657 (32.9% advantage for the A10-4600M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureA10-4600MCore i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
0 kB
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+220%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
32 nm
Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
1,948
19,532+903%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
342
1,700+397%
Geekbench 6 Multi
916+39%
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4600M versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4600M) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureA10-4600MCore i5-12400F
Socket
FS1r2
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureA10-4600MCore i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Gaming Performance/Value