A10-9620P
VS
Core i7-13700K

A10-9620P vs Core i7-13700K

AMD

A10-9620P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A10-9620P is positioned at rank #537 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9620P

#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
99%
#525
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
700%
#526
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
690%
#527
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
633%
#528
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
631%
#529
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
625%
#531
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
603%
#532
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
579%
#533
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
578%
#534
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
562%
#537
A10-9620P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K

#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
105%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
104%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
103%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
103%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
103%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
103%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
103%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
103%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
103%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
102%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
102%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
101%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
100%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
100%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
100%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
100%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
99%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
99%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
98%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
98%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
98%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
98%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
98%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
97%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
97%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
97%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
96%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-13700K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A10-9620P in both compute-intensive tasks (179.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA10-9620PCore i7-13700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-9620PCore i7-13700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9620P and Core i7-13700K

AMD

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 179.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 485 vs 2,846, a 141.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10-9620PCore i7-13700K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
16 / 24+300%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.4 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (per core)
Process
28 nm
Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark
2,514
45,784+1721%
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
Geekbench 6 Single
485
2,846+487%
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Core i7-13700K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10-9620PCore i7-13700K
Socket
FP4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
20+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs true (Core i7-13700K). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureA10-9620PCore i7-13700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Laptop