
A8-8600P

Core i5-13400F
A8-8600P vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-8600P vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-8600P vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-8600P
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,160 vs 16,211).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FP4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +262.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 677.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and older memory support.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A8-8600P.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.7% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-8600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than A8-8600P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-8600P vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P
The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 164.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,160 vs 16,211 (134.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 499 vs 2,407, a 131.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,300 vs 11,408 (159.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | — | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 2,464 | 25,029+916% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,160 | 16,211+413% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 499 | 2,407+382% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,300 | 11,408+778% |
Memory & Platform
The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A8-8600P versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A8-8600P) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-8600P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+125% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 192 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 20+67% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-8600P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8-8600P was priced at $150, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($150 vs $196), A8-8600P was $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-8600P delivers 16.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 154.4% better value option.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-23% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | 127.7+679% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















