Arc A380 vs GeForce RTX 2060
Arc A380
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 124% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A380.
| Insight | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-124%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+124%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $119), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 122.1% better value per dollar than the Arc A380.
| Insight | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+122.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($119) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and GeForce RTX 2060
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A380 scores 6,301 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 124%. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A380) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 128 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301 | 14,114+124% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+22% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 30+275% |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 240+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 80.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 186 GB/s | 336 GB/s+81% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 190mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 190mm | 229mm |
| Height | 114mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 59-18% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0 | 88.2+5% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A380 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $119, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Arc A380 costs 0.8% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.9 (Arc A380) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 122.3% better value. The Arc A380 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-57% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $119 | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.9 | 117.6+122% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | TU106 |
| Release | June 14 2022 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #384 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A380 and GeForce RTX 2060
