Athlon 5350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Athlon 5350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2 / 2

1,777

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,777 vs 1,796).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5350.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5350 better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5350 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $55 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82's 1,777 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 5350.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.05 GHz	2.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,796+1%	1,777
Geekbench 6 Single	223	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	708	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Socket	AM1	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 5350) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.