Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-74
2 / 2
1,658
0.0%
brand logoAthlon X2 BE-2300
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 3800+
brand logoAthlon Neo MV-40
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 5000+
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 5755GE
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen 7 3700X
8 / 16
22,430
+1252.8%
brand logoRyzen 3 PRO 7330U
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
brand logoRyzen 7 4980U
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 220
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low200 FPS
medium163 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra110 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium525 FPS
high428 FPS
ultra383 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low293 FPS
medium221 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low298 FPS
medium265 FPS
high209 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low350 FPS
medium300 FPS
high258 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon 64 FX-74
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low236 FPS
medium220 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra174 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,658 vs 22,430).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
    • ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

    Ryzen 7 3700X

    2019

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +525.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
    • ✅Delivers 1951.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
    • ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
    • ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon 64 FX-74?
    Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 525.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1252.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 525.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1252.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $170 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it still gives you a 525.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1951.9% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 FX-74

    The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 3700X

    The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 172.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-74 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

    FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Ryzen 7 3700X
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    8 / 16+300%
    Boost Clock
    3 GHz
    4.4 GHz+47%
    Base Clock
    —
    3.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    32 MB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    512K (per core)+51100%
    Process
    90 nm
    7 nm, 12 nm-92%
    Architecture
    Windsor (2006−2007)
    Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
    PassMark
    1,658
    22,430+1253%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    400
    —
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    750
    —
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 159900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 680a (Athlon 64 FX-74) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

    FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Ryzen 7 3700X
    Socket
    F
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 4.0+264%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2
    DDR4-3200+159900%
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    128 GB+700%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    24+50%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

    FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Ryzen 7 3700X
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    —
    Target Use
    Budget
    —
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-74 was priced at $499, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($499 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-74 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 181.4% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Ryzen 7 3700X
    MSRP
    $499
    $329-34%
    Performance per Dollar
    3.3
    68.2+1967%
    Release Date
    2006
    2019
    Search Athlon 64 FX-74 on AmazonSearch Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.